Full Stack Web Development

Who this is for

• Founders who need one person to own the whole build
• Teams with a designer but no engineer to implement
• Companies with a backend team needing a frontend specialist
• Products that have outgrown a no-code tool

What you get

• Production web application, deployed and monitored
• Database schema with migrations
• Documented REST or GraphQL API
• Responsive, accessible interface built from your designs
• Authentication and role-based access control
• Source code with a README that lets someone else take over
• 30 days of post-launch support

One person owning the whole stack

The expensive failures in web projects are rarely inside the frontend or the backend — they are at the seam. An API shaped for the database rather than the interface, an auth model that works on the server and cannot be represented in the UI, a data model that makes the one screen the client cares about impossible to build efficiently. When one developer owns both sides, those mismatches get resolved in an afternoon instead of a sprint of negotiation.

Designs implemented as specified

Figma files get implemented to the spacing, type scale and states actually in them, including the hover, focus, empty, loading and error states most implementations skip. Having done UI/UX work directly means reading a design file as intent rather than as a picture — and flagging where a design will break at a real breakpoint or with real data before building it.

Performance and accessibility as build constraints

Core Web Vitals and keyboard accessibility get designed in, not audited afterwards. Retrofitting either is significantly more expensive than building with them in mind: layout stability is a consequence of how components reserve space, and accessible interaction comes from choosing the right element in the first place.

Handover you can act on

Code is written to be picked up by whoever comes next — including the version of you that hires a team. That means a README that gets someone running locally, migrations rather than a hand-modified database, environment variables documented, and no undocumented deploy ritual living in one person's head.

How the engagement works

1. 01

   Discovery

   A 30-minute call to scope the work, agree the goals and set a timeline. You leave knowing what will be built, in what order, and what it depends on from you.

2. 02

   Design

   Wireframes and Figma flows you can react to before any code exists. Changing a layout in Figma costs minutes; changing it after the components are built costs days.

3. 03

   Build

   Async-first development with weekly demos against a working deployment. You see real software every week, not status updates.

4. 04

   Ship

   Deployment with monitoring, a documented handover, and 24-hour response times for 30 days after launch.

Technology

Frontend

Angular for structured enterprise applications where the framework's opinions are an asset; Next.js and React where server rendering, SEO or streaming matter; TypeScript throughout.

Backend

Node.js and Express for JavaScript-native APIs sharing types with the frontend; Python and Django where the ecosystem or data work justifies it.

Data

PostgreSQL when relationships and constraints matter; MongoDB when documents vary in shape; Supabase or Convex when managed auth and real-time subscriptions save weeks.

Delivery

Vercel, Docker, GitHub Actions, with monitoring configured before launch rather than after the first incident.

Proof

Frequently asked